International Academy for Leadership
Theodor-Heusse-Akademie, Gummersbach, Germany
as the sea gulls freely explore the sky, let these blog components (documentaries, essays, insights, travels, affiliations and works) reach and penetrate through peoples and nations who might have the same advocacy for good governance and fight against the diseases of poverty in the province of ilocos sur, the philippines and the global community in general
Monday, September 28, 2009
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Appointment with German Embassy
Guten tag!
04 September 2009, 0856 H: My schedule at the German Embassy (RCBC Tower 2).
I got my guide (pic below) and Visa forms and endorsement for my Embassy appointment:
Finally, I got these from FNSt. Thanks, Ms. Alexandra!
Thursday, September 3, 2009
PCSO 75th Anniversary
The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) will celebrate its Diamond Jubilee on September 6, 2009. PCSO desires to conduct nationwide medical and dental mission to possibly qualify in the Guiness Book of Records as the most massive and most extensive medical mission in one day.
To implement it in the Province of Ilocos Sur, PCSO partnered with the Jerry C. Singson Foundation Inc. or the JCS Foundation with flagship, Joint Community Services.
To implement it in the Province of Ilocos Sur, PCSO partnered with the Jerry C. Singson Foundation Inc. or the JCS Foundation with flagship, Joint Community Services.
Indeed, with this event, the Charity Virus will continue to reach all throughout the most indigents of the 32 municipalities and two cities of the province of Ilocos Sur.
My Essay on FNF NPM Phase I
NPM
in PA: Reforming Human Resources
by Marlon F. Tagorda
Public
administration has always been a dynamic element of the government which
incessantly responds to the continuous demands of time. For the economy to grow, the government must
able to comply with the requirements of its people. This entails various applications of relative
techniques to prevent the government and its citizens from suffering its
consequent distress.
The public often equate public
administration with corrupt leaders, provides inadequate information, poor
quality services, an extended arm of central powers and violation with existing
laws. Though public administration
existed long before the turn of the 19th century with Max Weber’s
bureaucracy, the perfection of its application was observed to be of bearish
trend. Think tanks have conceptualized a
new approach to better off the general welfare of the people by employing the
market-driven mechanisms.
To maximize efficiency and
effectiveness in governance, one technique that emerged was the New Public
Management (NPM). The Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development in a survey conducted concluded that new
management techniques and practices involving market-type mechanisms associated
with the private sector are being used to bring about changes in the management
of public services in countries that have widely varying governance, economic
and institutional environments (Larbi, 1999).
The
central feature of NPM is the attempt to introduce or simulate, within those
sections of the public service that are not privatized, the performance
incentives and the disciplines that exist in a market environment. According to Metcalfe and Richards as cited
by Larbi (Ibid.), “the assumption is that there are benefits in terms of
efficiency and effectiveness in exposing public sector activities to market
pressures and in using markets to serve public purposes, and that government
can learn from the private sector despite contextual differences.” In addition, Larbi quoted Bienefeld and
Mukandala (Ibid.) that “a noticeable trend in public sector reforms, in the
context of economic crisis and structural adjustment, is that a wider range of
administrative functions and the delivery of public services are being
subjected to the approach.”
The state
may have become leaner and the control of its affairs may be more
manageable. With the NPM, the criticisms
of the stereotyped public administration may be offset. Correspondingly, this innovative approach may
appear to be defenseless and may not be the prime methodology of the state if
the leaders still remain to be off-tangent with its general objectives. Vulnerability of tactics depends largely with
the values of the leaders of the organization.
Government, particularly the
political-administrative leaders, must possess essential values to ensure the
people with equitable benefits.
Twenty-first century leaders must formulate courses of actions to
mobilize resources down to the grassroots level and must have profound respect
for human rights.
In the Philippine setting, lots of
different flagship of every national administration have been introduced and
were cut-off after every turn of new administration. This is one of the reasons why the country
seems not to achieve development. Cutting
shorts every national goals and objectives relative to the foremost leader
brought unsound and wobbly administration.
With the
present administration, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has instituted her
10-point agenda that encompasses vision to promote livelihood, infrastructure,
decentralization and peace process. In
her most recent State of the Nation Address (SONA), PGMA enumerated several
achievements that confer her agenda. Particularly,
she stressed that her administration has invested three times that of three
previous administrations combined in technical and skills training. She even presented one student (Jennifer
Silbor) who has acquired medical transcription skills that paved way to her
significant income. On the contrary,
similar students as Silbor have reported that one institution which implemented
this government training seems to be deflective. Though PGMA has confidently emphasized the
achievement, there were problems encountered.
This may be traced back on the management of this undertaking. Should there have been efficient
implementation and monitoring of every program, there may be no drawbacks. This may be asserted with the manpower that
directly holds the program.
Hence, reform must not at all be
within the system but more importantly and of the greatest essence, within the
human resources of the system. Economist
Toby Monsod presented her research on the Philippine bureaucracy at the
Philippine Economic Society 2008 Conference.
The study discussed inequities, position overlapping and the 2004 personnel
size of the government that accounted to almost 1.5 million employees. These data is the main concern of the New
Public Management – to make the state lean.
In conclusion, reform, primarily in
the system, may have a lesser bearing as it tackles only the institutional
framework of the government. Reform
within the human resources may be more liberally affective as it fundamentally
deals with humans. As the government desires
for a leaner state, the government must take a liberal move to possibly trim
down its size. The government must forgo
some of the inequities and position overlapping by reforming the organization
of each department and/or agency.
Consequently, the government will be easier to manage, programs will be
effectively carried and the expenses relative to the defunct positions can be
utilized for other demands of its citizenry.
Sources:
1.
Arroyo, Gloria. 2009. State of the Nation
Address (SONA). PIA, Manila, Philippines
2.
Larbi, George. 1999. Discussion Paper No. 112
The New Public Management Approach and Crisis States. United Nations Research
Institute for Social Development, Switzerland
3.
Monsod, Toby. 2008. The Philippine
Bureaucracy: Incentive Structures and Implications for Performance. Philippine
Economic Society (PES), Philippines
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Forum Starts
Finally the forum started and I had forwarded the message below to all my region-mates (Southeast and East Asia):
Good Day!
Our Region, the Southeast and East Asia, must prepare our
political analysis and proposed NPM projects before we step in
Gummersbach.
FYI: Southeast and East Asia (SEEA) Members are:
Edwin de Nicolas (Philippines)
Yih Jia Ng (Malaysia)
Ang Sang (China)
Priyanka Sharma (India)
Sopheap Suon (Cambodia)
Myself, Marlon Tagorda (Philippines)
Kan Yuenyong (Thailand)
If I may suggest, let us first nominate our SEEA Head and SEEA
Secretary.
To define:
SEEA Head:
1. Represents the Southeast and East Asia.
2. Reports to the Gummersbach our write-ups.
3. Do other jobs pertinent to SEEA.
SEEA Secretary:
1. Collates the ideas and views of each member of the SEEA.
2. Makes final write-up analysis based on the contributions of each
member.
3. Submits the output to all members of the SEEA.
As per profile, I want to nominate the following:
SEEA Head - Edwin de Nicolas for his profession and vast experience
in planning and development.
SEEA Secretary - Priyanka Sharma for her experience as program
manager.
Please furnish all the SEEA Members and our Moderators your nominated
candidate for the SEEA Head and Secretary.
With this initial step, I Hssure you that the Southeast and East Asia
(SEEA) Region will be well-equipped prior to Gummersbach. Thank you
very much and I am anticipating your most accommodating response to
this exercise.
Good Day!
Our Region, the Southeast and East Asia, must prepare our
political analysis and proposed NPM projects before we step in
Gummersbach.
FYI: Southeast and East Asia (SEEA) Members are:
Edwin de Nicolas (Philippines)
Yih Jia Ng (Malaysia)
Ang Sang (China)
Priyanka Sharma (India)
Sopheap Suon (Cambodia)
Myself, Marlon Tagorda (Philippines)
Kan Yuenyong (Thailand)
If I may suggest, let us first nominate our SEEA Head and SEEA
Secretary.
To define:
SEEA Head:
1. Represents the Southeast and East Asia.
2. Reports to the Gummersbach our write-ups.
3. Do other jobs pertinent to SEEA.
SEEA Secretary:
1. Collates the ideas and views of each member of the SEEA.
2. Makes final write-up analysis based on the contributions of each
member.
3. Submits the output to all members of the SEEA.
As per profile, I want to nominate the following:
SEEA Head - Edwin de Nicolas for his profession and vast experience
in planning and development.
SEEA Secretary - Priyanka Sharma for her experience as program
manager.
Please furnish all the SEEA Members and our Moderators your nominated
candidate for the SEEA Head and Secretary.
With this initial step, I Hssure you that the Southeast and East Asia
(SEEA) Region will be well-equipped prior to Gummersbach. Thank you
very much and I am anticipating your most accommodating response to
this exercise.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
The Genesis
Today marks great beginnings in my life. Last 27 August 2009, the Friedrich Naumann Stiftung fur die Freiheit Philippine Office Communications Officer, Ms. Alexandra Cuyegkeng, called me and informed of my acceptance to the Offline Seminar Phase II of the New Public Management: Lean State, Lean Management. Initially, I was starstrucked and became unaware of the consequent events to follow after that statement. I asked her, "Meaning?" She frankly said, "You're going to Germany!"
With that statement, I became more numbed and all i did was to shout YES!!!
After I came back to my senses, I realized how fortunate I am to be chosen among 86 global mix of participants in the Online Phase I last 24 July to 22 August. I then contemplated how well did I excel in the Online Phase. Though I admit that I may not be the best for this batch, I can confidently say how successful I was in submitting to the requirements IAF demanded and how I diligently followed deadlines of each requirement.
Today - Septqmber 1 - startsuour Phase II anu I have visiteduthe site, but to no avail, the Forum isn't open yet. Since Phase I ended last 22 August, I have devotedly visited the same avenue everyday (actually, everytime I'm online), to check for possible messages from my co-participants and to monitor if I will be informed on my acceptance to Phase II.
To prepare for future networking, I create this blog to post details of my life, my work and the community where I could possibly apply liberal views.
After today, I am anticipating more great beginnings in my life.
With that statement, I became more numbed and all i did was to shout YES!!!
After I came back to my senses, I realized how fortunate I am to be chosen among 86 global mix of participants in the Online Phase I last 24 July to 22 August. I then contemplated how well did I excel in the Online Phase. Though I admit that I may not be the best for this batch, I can confidently say how successful I was in submitting to the requirements IAF demanded and how I diligently followed deadlines of each requirement.
Today - Septqmber 1 - startsuour Phase II anu I have visiteduthe site, but to no avail, the Forum isn't open yet. Since Phase I ended last 22 August, I have devotedly visited the same avenue everyday (actually, everytime I'm online), to check for possible messages from my co-participants and to monitor if I will be informed on my acceptance to Phase II.
To prepare for future networking, I create this blog to post details of my life, my work and the community where I could possibly apply liberal views.
After today, I am anticipating more great beginnings in my life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
- View my profile
- Create your own travel map or travel blog
- Vacation rentals at TripAdvisor